2002 BMW 332 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2002 BMW 332 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 332 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW 332. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 332 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 332 | Munga |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 31 L |