2002 BMW 332 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 BMW 332 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (202 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 332 weights approximately 197 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 332 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 332 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 125 L |
