2002 BMW 332 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 BMW 332 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 332 (330 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 332 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 332 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2580 mm |