2002 BMW 332 vs. 1999 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2002 BMW 332 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Tracer weights approximately 79 kg more than 2002 BMW 332.
Because 2002 BMW 332 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW 332. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 332 (330 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mercury Tracer. (170 Nm). This means 2002 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 332 | 1999 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | 332 | Tracer |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |