2002 BMW 332 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP) has 184 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW 332. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 332. (330 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 332.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 332 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 332 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |