2002 BMW 332 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 123 kg more than 2002 BMW 332.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 332. (330 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 332. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW 332 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW 332 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 BMW 332 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 332 CTS
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 338 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.1 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.6:1 11.3
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 1778 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]