2002 BMW 332 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 332 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac XTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 257 kg more than 2002 BMW 332.

Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW 332. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 332. (330 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 332. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW 332 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW 332 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 BMW 332 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 332 XTS
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 338 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.1 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.6:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 1912 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]