2002 BMW 740 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 BMW 740 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,901 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 740 (254 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 740 weights approximately 1076 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 740 (600 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 467 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 740 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 740 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3901 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2016 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 57 L |