2002 BMW 760 vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 BMW 760 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 760 weights approximately 369 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 760 (600 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 760 | 1955 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 760 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1725 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3110 mm |