2002 BMW 760 vs. 1968 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2002 BMW 760 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,549 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1968 Pontiac GTO. (365 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 1968 Pontiac GTO.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Pontiac GTO (603 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 760. (600 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1968 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 760.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 760 | 1968 Pontiac GTO | |
Make | BMW | Pontiac |
Model | 760 | GTO |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 6549 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 603 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 104.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 69 L |