2002 BMW 760 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 760 would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 190 kg more than 2002 BMW 760.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 760 (601 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2002 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 760 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 760 | Armada |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 438 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 601 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 2344 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 20.5 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 106 L |
