2002 BMW 760 vs. 2009 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 760 would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 760 (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 760 weights approximately 1283 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 760 (601 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. 2002 BMW 760 has automatic transmission and 2009 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2009 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW 760 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 760 | 2009 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 760 | Matiz |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 601 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 152 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 871 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 20.5 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 35 L |