2002 BMW 760 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 760 would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2002 BMW 760. (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 760.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 760 (601 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Aston Martin Virage. (569 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Aston Martin Virage.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 760 | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | BMW | Aston Martin |
| Model | 760 | Virage |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 438 HP | 490 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 601 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
