2002 BMW 760 vs. 2013 Bentley Mulsane
To start off, 2013 Bentley Mulsane is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 760 would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Bentley Mulsane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (505 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2002 BMW 760. (438 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Mulsane should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 760. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Bentley Mulsane weights approximately 431 kg more than 2002 BMW 760. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (1,020 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 760. (601 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Bentley Mulsane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 760.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 760 | 2013 Bentley Mulsane | |
| Make | BMW | Bentley |
| Model | 760 | Mulsane |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 6752 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 438 HP | 505 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 601 Nm | 1020 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 2585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5575 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2208 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1521 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3266 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 20.5 L/100km | 20.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 96 L |
