2002 BMW 760 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 760 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 760 weights approximately 1334 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 760 (601 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 760 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | BMW | Smart |
| Model | 760 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 438 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 601 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.7 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 20.5 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 33 L |
