2002 BMW Formula FB02 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Formula FB02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Formula FB02 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 BMW Formula FB02 has automatic transmission and 2006 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2006 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Formula FB02 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Formula FB02 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Formula FB02 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
