2002 BMW Formula FB02 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Formula FB02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Formula FB02 would be higher.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Formula FB02. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Formula FB02 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | Formula FB02 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 464 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
