2002 BMW Formula One vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2002 BMW Formula One is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Formula One (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Formula One should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 BMW Formula One.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Formula One. (355 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Formula One.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Formula One | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Formula One | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 6390 cc |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 2125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 79 L |
