2002 BMW Formula One vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six

To start off, 2002 BMW Formula One is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,246 cc, 2002 BMW Formula One is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Formula One (317 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Formula One should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Formula One weights approximately 852 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Formula One (355 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Formula One will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.

Compare all specifications: