2002 BMW Formula One vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Formula One. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Formula One would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Formula One (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche. (316 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Formula One should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 909 kg more than 2002 BMW Formula One.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW Formula One. (355 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW Formula One.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW Formula One | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Formula One | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 5328 cc |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 316 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 2559 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 119 L |
