2002 BMW M3 vs. 1949 Holden FX
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP) has 393 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 128 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1949 Holden FX | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M3 | FX |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 972 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |
