2002 BMW M3 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 10 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1949 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | M3 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1110 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |