2002 BMW M3 vs. 1950 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Buick 40. (285 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1950 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4065 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1640 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3090 mm |