2002 BMW M3 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 292 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3090 mm |