2002 BMW M3 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 195 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | M3 | XK |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2600 mm |
