2002 BMW M3 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (325 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3110 mm |