2002 BMW M3 vs. 1956 Chrysler C
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler C. (350 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 780 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (560 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (480 Nm). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1956 Chrysler C | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | M3 | C |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 5801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3210 mm |
