2002 BMW M3 vs. 1958 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1958 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1958 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | BMW | Isuzu |
| Model | M3 | Minx |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |
