2002 BMW M3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3310 mm |
