2002 BMW M3 vs. 1959 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 368 more horse power than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 92 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (188 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1959 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1192 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2720 mm |