2002 BMW M3 vs. 1960 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 350 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1960 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | MK II |
Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1450 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2900 mm |