2002 BMW M3 vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | BMW | Triumph |
| Model | M3 | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 29 L |
