2002 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Citroen 2CV

To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 426 more horse power than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1963 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 456 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen 2CV. (24 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: