2002 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Holden FB Special

To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1963 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1963 Holden FB Special. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden FB Special.

Compare all specifications: