2002 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 75 L |
