2002 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar MK X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK X (361 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1964 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | MK X |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 63 L |