2002 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 735 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | M3 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 40 L |