2002 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 420 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1964 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | M3 | Beetle |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1131 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |