2002 BMW M3 vs. 1965 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 950 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1965 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2050 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3300 mm |
