2002 BMW M3 vs. 1965 Marcos 1800
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1965 Marcos 1800. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Marcos 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1965 Marcos 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Marcos 1800. (149 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Marcos 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1965 Marcos 1800 | |
| Make | BMW | Marcos |
| Model | M3 | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2280 mm |
