2002 BMW M3 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 418 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 434 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | BMW | DAF |
| Model | M3 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 666 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
