2002 BMW M3 vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 409 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | M3 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 760 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2250 mm |
