2002 BMW M3 vs. 1967 DKW Munga
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1967 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1967 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | M3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 79 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 31 L |