2002 BMW M3 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 57 L |