2002 BMW M3 vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | 120 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |