2002 BMW M3 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 395 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (352 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | M3 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 5208 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2800 mm |
