2002 BMW M3 vs. 1970 Volvo 120
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 120. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1970 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Volvo 120. (157 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1970 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | M3 | 120 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1030 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
