2002 BMW M3 vs. 1972 Seat 127
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 127 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1972 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1972 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Seat 127. (63 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 1972 Seat 127 | |
| Make | BMW | Seat |
| Model | M3 | 127 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 902 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 705 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2230 mm |
