2002 BMW M3 vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 240 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (158 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1340 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |