2002 BMW M3 vs. 1983 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 340 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 70 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW M3 | 1983 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | Cressida |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3997 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2650 mm |